<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Sally Clark &#187; Neighborhoods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://clark.seattle.gov/category/neighborhoods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://clark.seattle.gov</link>
	<description>Seattle City Councilmember Sally J. Clark&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mid-point check-in</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2012/07/06/mid-point-check-in/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2012/07/06/mid-point-check-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget and Economic Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seattle Public Utilities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clark.seattle.gov/?p=1714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow we got into July and I’m not sure how that happened. At the top of this year the Council went through our annual agenda priorities exercise which yielded this 2012 Action Agenda and I thought, “Great. We finished this relatively quickly at the start of the year. Now we have the year ahead of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow we got into July and I’m not sure how that happened. At the top of this year the Council went through our annual agenda priorities exercise which yielded this 2012 Action Agenda and I thought, “Great. We finished this relatively quickly at the start of the year. Now we have the year ahead of us to get work done.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Suddenly, we have less than half the year ahead of us. The good news is we’ve accomplished a great deal. The bad news is this is when I look at my wall calendar I realize we’re almost at the August hiatus which means we’re almost to the budget break which means we’re almost to the end of the year. Cripes!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>My goals as Council President have been to 1) not screw up anything permanently (the general elected person’s version of the medical world’s “do no harm” oath); 2) keep the Council moving forward on our action priorities; and 3) do my part to keep the city focused on delivering service in a high quality way while we wrestle with the complex, knotty questions that invariably pop up despite the fact they aren’t listed anywhere on the action agenda. (Arenas, historic streetcars and profit-making ziplines, anyone?)</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I may be biased (OK, quite biased), but I think the Council (and the city staff who help us) did pretty well by our priorities in the first half of the year. Among other accomplishments:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>The Third Avenue Initiative is underway coordinating city department work to clean up and better maintain Third Avenue through Downtown. Councilmember Rasmussen knows every inch of Third Ave. at this point.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Construction of the First Hill Street Car is underway with the extension into Pioneer Square assured and the extension to Aloha Street under review. Councilmember Rasmussen has pushed this, as well, with Councilmember Conlin doing his part at the Sound Transit Board.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>We adopted an administration and finance plan for effectively using the Families &amp; Education Levy funds approved by voters last fall. Councilmember Burgess spearheaded that work.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>The first Neighborhood Greenway opened through Wallingford this spring. Councilmember Bagshaw’s middle name is “Greenway.”</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>We worked with allies in other cities and the state legislature to quell costly changes in Business and Occupation Tax collection and have launched work with allies on a better approach to simplification for businesses. This has been a big one for me.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Squeaking in just at the start of July we adopted a Strategic Plan for Seattle City Light after thousands of hours of work by volunteers and staff. Councilmember O’Brien carried this over the line after multiple years of effort by Councilmember Harrell.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Earlier this week we gave the final committee-level nod to asking voters to approve a bond sale for financing replacement of the central seawall. Councilmember Godden chairs this special committee.</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We have a list of big items ahead of us before the December break – final decisions on new housing, zoning, parks and streets for the Yesler Terrace neighborhood (Councilmember Licata has the sharpest pencil reviewing this proposal); the SODO arena proposal; new zoning for South Lake Union; final rules on a rental housing licensing and inspection program; and more. We’ll receive the concept plan for the future Seattle waterfront later this month. We’ll spend October and November taking apart and reassembling the budget for 2013, including a probable shortfall of approximately $30 million.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We’ve also taken up brief conversations a few readers will think less important. I’m an optimist, though. I think we can review and act on something as detailed as the Seattle City Light Strategic Plan and have brain space available to consider a resolution on the potential impacts of coal trains chugging through Seattle.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I am disappointed to not have progress to report in one particular area – the City’s response to the United States Department of Justice’s December report on cases of excessive use of force by Seattle Police. While negotiations are currently the work of the Mayor and City Attorney, the crafting of new policies and the necessary staff and budget changes are of concern to all Councilmembers and rated as the Council’s highest priority for this year.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I believe the sooner the City reaches a fair agreement with the DOJ, the better for our police officers and the greater community. Ongoing pokes and disagreements about the validity of certain statistics cited in the DOJ findings do nothing to move us forward. Instead, the delays, intentional leaks to media, and resistance to change allow doubt and resentment to fester. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It’s time for a reasonable negotiated agreement that puts Seattle on track to developing and living the policies and procedures, the training, the supervision and the accountability our officers and community deserve. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>There will be a price tag for making changes. We should calculate the real cost of reasonable, negotiated changes and then take responsibility for the difficult decisions we’ll need to make to pay for these changes.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>We can do this. We can use this difficult opportunity to elevate Seattle to the top tier of urban policing. I hope to be able to blog soon that we have. We have less than half the year to go to get started.</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=1714" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2012/07/06/mid-point-check-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t mess with Beacon</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2011/03/14/don%e2%80%99t-mess-with-beacon/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2011/03/14/don%e2%80%99t-mess-with-beacon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clark.seattle.gov/?p=1361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seattle Magazine earned the scorn of Beacon Hill residents with a recent mock love letter from a frenemy.  The writer feigns disappointment in Beacon Hill, but in an oddly condescending way. “And we had such high hopes for a special friendship… You have your very own superslick Link light rail station and are just so [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seattle Magazine earned the scorn of Beacon Hill residents with a recent mock love letter from a frenemy.  The writer feigns disappointment in Beacon Hill, but in an oddly condescending way. “And we had such high hopes for a special friendship… You have your very own superslick Link light rail station and are just so friggin’ close to downtown! It seems a no-brainer that’d we’d be besties. But we’re not and I can’t for the life of me figure out why.” The letter than runs through a series of supposed slights suffered by Beacon Hill recently, including the loss of an uber-hip restaurant/butcher and the move by Amazon from the PacMed building to “younger, sexier South Lake Union.” “Such typical first-wife treatment.”</p>
<p>If you missed it, here’s <a href="http://www.seattlemag.com/article/guides/neighborhoods/sweet-streets-open-letter-beacon-hill" target="_blank">the link</a>. The best part is the string of comments that follow from Beaconites more than happy to be over-looked by Seattle Magazine. First Place goes to the commenter who notes sarcastically he or she would write more often if the broadband on Beacon Hill worked consistently and says wrapping up: “Gotta go grab some yummy Philiphino [sic] food served up by a cross-dressing broadway [sic] show tunes singing waiter.”</p>
<p>Careful. You’ll make Amazon regret their move.</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=1361" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2011/03/14/don%e2%80%99t-mess-with-beacon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank you, NPAC</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2010/01/19/maybe-parking-in-order-to-ride-isn%e2%80%99t-so-bad-for-a-while-2/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2010/01/19/maybe-parking-in-order-to-ride-isn%e2%80%99t-so-bad-for-a-while-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning and Land Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clark.seattle.gov/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Councilmember Mike O’Brien and I are attending the final meeting tonight of the Neighborhood Planning Advisory Committee. This has been a hard-working, sometimes stressed out, outspoken group of neighborhood and community representatives committed to making neighborhood plan update work successful. They’ve met monthly (plus sub-committee meetings) for a year and produced an impressive amount of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Councilmember Mike O’Brien and I are attending the final meeting tonight of the Neighborhood Planning Advisory Committee. This has been a hard-working, sometimes stressed out, outspoken group of neighborhood and community representatives committed to making neighborhood plan update work successful. They’ve met monthly (plus sub-committee meetings) for a year and produced an impressive amount of work. The Council tasked them with helping the city devise exactly how we would update neighborhood plans and how we would work with neighborhoods to figure out the current state of affairs. I was about to type that this wasn’t always easy, but I think it would be more accurate to type that this was NEVER easy. No one has the play book for how to best update neighborhood plans. This group of volunteers rolled up their sleeves and worked out recommendations for how to talk with people about the plan updates, how to think about long-term stewardship, how to move into the next set of neighborhoods for plan updates, and they were never at a loss for how to “critique” city staff’s work as not being community-based enough. (Some were perhaps a bit more savage in those critiques than called for, but we ran that risk when we asked for feedback.) Plan update town meetings, plan updates and <a href="http://www.seattle.gov/dpd/Planning/Neighborhood_Planning/StatusReports/DPDS017130.asp"> neighborhood plan status reports</a> are the better for their involvement.</p>
<p>NPAC is wrapping tonight, but I’m committed to neighborhood planning and the development of the update system being community driven. I look forward to the McGinn team bringing a fresh perspective on community engagement and to ownership of plan updates and implementation. The plans remain the greatest tool for connecting people to each other in neighborhoods and for shaping how our neighborhoods change over time.</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=937" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2010/01/19/maybe-parking-in-order-to-ride-isn%e2%80%99t-so-bad-for-a-while-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food bank robbed</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/11/19/food-bank-robbed/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/11/19/food-bank-robbed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing, Human Services, and Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Services]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://clark.seattle.gov/?p=926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a worse blow to your karma than robbing a food bank the week before Thanksgiving? I guess it could be worse if you rob a food bank in the part of Seattle with the lowest incomes. I guess that would be a worse blow to your karma. The Rainier Valley Food Bank had [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a worse blow to your karma than robbing a food bank the week before Thanksgiving? I guess it could be worse if you rob a food bank in the part of Seattle with the lowest incomes. I guess that would be a worse blow to your karma.</p>
<p>The Rainier Valley Food Bank had their external storage container cleaned out by thieves Tuesday night or Wednesday morning. They had enough food inside the warehouse (and I use that term loosely as it&#8217;s a tiny space) to serve the regular Wednesday morning crowd of seniors and disabled people, but Saturday &#8212; the day after tomorrow &#8212; low- income individuals and families will line-up for help making it through Thanksgiving week, the week of giving thanks for bounty and cooperation. The food bank is accepting donations 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday, 4205 Rainier Ave. S., Seattle, WA 98118. If you aren&#8217;t able to help Rainier Valley Food Bank make up the loss, maybe consider helping out the food bank in your part of town. Overall Seattle&#8217;s food banks report 50 percent to 100 percent increases in the numbers of people lining up for help. The Mayor and Council made sure next year&#8217;s City budget maintains City support for food banks, but no one’s budgets anticipate grand-scale thievery from food banks.</p>
<p>I and my staff volunteered at the Rainier Valley Food Bank earlier this year on a Wednesday. They run a great operation. No food bank deserves to be ripped off. It&#8217;s hard to imagine the thinking behind the crime. Taking the entire contents of the storage container isn&#8217;t about an individual who is hungry. Will they re-sell the bags of rice, the boxes of pasta, the cans of tuna? I&#8217;m clearly missing the master- mind strategy of it all.</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=926" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/11/19/food-bank-robbed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backyard cottage consideration begins</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/08/12/backyard-cottage-consideration-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/08/12/backyard-cottage-consideration-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning and Land Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloginweb/sallyclark/?p=523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The waiting is over &#8211; backyard cottages legislation has arrived and is in play. In a nutshell, the proposal delivered to Council would take the rules in place in Southeast Seattle since 2006 and expand them out to the whole city. You would be eligible to build a backyard cottage if: You&#8217;re in single-family zoning;You [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The waiting is over &#8211; backyard cottages legislation has arrived and is in  play.</p>
<p>In a nutshell, the proposal delivered to Council would take the rules in  place in Southeast Seattle since 2006 and expand them out to the whole city. You  would be eligible to build a backyard cottage if:</p>
<ol>
<li>You&#8217;re in single-family zoning;<!--
<li-->You have a lot that is at least 4,000  square feet in area;</li>
<li>You haven&#8217;t (and won&#8217;t ultimately) exceed the 35 percent lot coverage limit;</li>
<li>Your cottage wouldn&#8217;t cover more than 40 percent of your backyard; and</li>
<li>Your proposed cottage doesn&#8217;t exceed 800 square feet total.</li>
</ol>
<p>There are also rules about height that connect with the width of the lot (you  could get up to 23 feet if you have a lot at least 40 feet wide) and another  that would cap the number of new ones at 50 per year.</p>
<p>So far I&#8217;ve been on three detached accessory dwelling unit tours, two in  Southeast of newly built cottages and one in North Seattle of cottages that have  been around for decades. I have approximately six to see in Southeast before I  will have seen the whole crop of cottages that have sprung up since 2006. So  far, some are fantastic looking, some are less fantastic (perhaps mediocre)  looking. Kind of like homes in general. The ones with the biggest visual impact  for me so far have been the full two-story cottages. I have to admit &#8211; they look  big. Maybe too big? Maybe 800 square feet is too much? Maybe 23 feet is too  high? Maybe it&#8217;s just those two numbers together?</p>
<p>The proposal was unveiled to the Council at this morning&#8217;s Planning, Land Use  &amp; Neighborhoods Committee. The committee plan going forward is for a  follow-up discussion about the proposal at PLUNC&#8217;s September 9 meeting, then a  public hearing Council Chambers the evening of September 15. The earliest  possible date for a committee vote would be Sept. 23. I don&#8217;t know if we&#8217;ll be  ready to vote by then. We&#8217;ll see what happens in committee on Sept. 9 and then  at the public hearing.</p>
<p>OK, and yes, I did insist on driving the van for the tour we did in Southeast  yesterday. I did, I confess, scrape the side of the van when turning to enter  the Sea Park Garage Downtown. It&#8217;s a big van and a tight turn and I was focused  on not hitting the yellow pole in front. Instead I scraped the side of the door.  Oops. Sorry, taxpayers.</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=523" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/08/12/backyard-cottage-consideration-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Corner</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/06/16/the-corner/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/06/16/the-corner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloginweb/sallyclark/?p=497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few days I&#8217;ve driven 23rd crossing Union a few times and noticed beautiful poster-size portraits of people in house-like wooden frames on the vacant corner kitty-corner from the old cheese steak place. The southwest corner of 23rd and Union used to be the old Colman Building. The Nisqually earthquake shook that brick [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few days I&#8217;ve driven 23rd crossing Union a few times and noticed beautiful poster-size portraits of people in house-like wooden frames on the vacant corner kitty-corner from the old cheese steak place. The southwest corner of 23rd and Union used to be the old Colman Building. The Nisqually earthquake shook that brick building beyond repair and it&#8217;s now gone. The lot awaits a new housing development that should appear when the soil cleanup is done and the housing market balances. In the meantime owner Jim Mueller is donating use of the property to The Corner, a very cool, summer-long inter-active art installation telling the history of the corner through people who remember it &#8220;then&#8221; and who have come to it in the &#8220;now.&#8221;<a href="http://23rdandunion.org/"> Check out the website, </a>&#8220;the public radio documentary you help to make,&#8221; where you can hear interviews with and see portraits of an array of people who live, work, linger and know the Central Area. Former Black Panthers, self-identified gentrifying white artists, former residents, current guardians &#8211; and maybe you? By calling the phone number on the website you can contribute your own story of how you remember or know 23rd and Union and the greater Central Area.</p>
<p>This is the greatest interactive public art project I&#8217;ve seen in a quite a while. Check it out.</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=497" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/06/16/the-corner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Never think neighborhood planning is easy</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/05/11/never-think-neighborhood-planning-is-easy/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/05/11/never-think-neighborhood-planning-is-easy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning and Land Use]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning and Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloginweb/sallyclark/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend&#8217;s neighborhood plan update town meeting in the Othello/New Holly neighborhood illustrated that neighborhood planning can be difficult, uncomfortable work. Several participants had pointed questions about who was running the show, where the process was headed and whether the day was really a cover for a city rezone agenda. The good news is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past weekend&#8217;s neighborhood plan update town meeting in the Othello/New Holly neighborhood illustrated that neighborhood planning can be difficult, uncomfortable work. Several participants had pointed questions about who was running the show, where the process was headed and whether the day was really a cover for a city rezone agenda. The good news is people are struggling to wrest ownership of the process from the city. That&#8217;s great. It means people (at least rhetorically) believe in building the process and the plan update together or with the community in the lead. The not so great news is that distrust of city staff and city goals is thick and sticky and weighs down those who want to get going shaping the plan update. In the end, a small group of people caucused with Department of Planning and Development leadership to talk about plan update process while approximately 70 people broke into smaller groups to look at the walkability, sustainability and scale of the neighborhood.</p>
<p>We knew last year when we finalized the structure for updating the neighborhood plans starting with three neighborhoods in Southeast Seattle that it would be tough going. It&#8217;s tough being first in a new initiative. We&#8217;ve never updated the plans so we&#8217;re all learning from successes and mistakes. That&#8217;s not comforting if you&#8217;re in the first neighborhood in the first wave of updates. We also knew it would be tough going because, frankly, there are oceans of ideological and personality differences separating many of the most ardent activists in Southeast. Wounds from the community discussion on community renewal are still open and raw. Distrust of the mayor bleeds into distrust of city staff. Distrust of new development and added density means a sea of skeptics. We need skeptics, we need watchdogs. However, sitting back with arms folded won&#8217;t make change go away.</p>
<p>Neighborhood people we saw at Othello/New Holly Saturday want more communication and they want more say in shaping the meetings. That&#8217;s good and the city should jump at that desire for connection and ownership. It needs to happen in a way that respects all the new voices that are coming to the process by way of the tremendous outreach work by the Department of Neighborhoods. I can&#8217;t imagine the neighborhoods will feel any differently at North Rainier or North Beacon Hill, both of which have town meetings coming up fast (North Rainier on Saturday, May 16, 9 a.m., at the Northwest African American Museum and North Beacon on Saturday, May 30, 9 a.m. at El Centro de la Raza).</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=51" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/05/11/never-think-neighborhood-planning-is-easy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Loss of a great neighborhood reporter</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/04/30/loss-of-a-great-neighborhood-reporter/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/04/30/loss-of-a-great-neighborhood-reporter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloginweb/sallyclark/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russ Zabel, the great reporter for the Queen Anne/Magnolia News, passed away April 12. In these days when major print media is &#8220;contracting&#8221; (that&#8217;s what the economists call it, but most of it just call it going bankrupt), I&#8217;ve found the smaller neighborhood newspapers in Seattle to be more important than ever. Russ did a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russ Zabel, the great reporter for the Queen Anne/Magnolia News, passed away April 12. In these days when major print media is &#8220;contracting&#8221; (that&#8217;s what the economists call it, but most of it just call it going bankrupt), I&#8217;ve found the smaller neighborhood newspapers in Seattle to be more important than ever. Russ did a fantastic job truly covering the news important to Queen Anne and Magnolia. He understood the finer grain of coverage for the neighborhoods. You&#8217;re as apt to read about Little League scores in the neighborhood paper as you are about Viaduct replacement conflict. He was also very able to pin down city councilmembers and other decisionmakers with pointed questions and suspicion. I was always happy to get to talk with Russ. He knew his stuff, he enjoyed a good conversation on complicated subjects, and he liked finding a wrong that could be righted.</p>
<p>Russ had what I consider to be a fantastic job serving the city with information and he made the most of it. As is often the case we learn so much about someone after they&#8217;re gone. The Queen Anne/Magnolia News ran a <a href="http://www.queenannenews.com/main.asp?Search=1&amp;ArticleID=28291&amp;SectionID=26&amp;SubSectionID=248&amp;S=1" target="_blank">great tribute</a> to Russ detailing his achievements and his life as a traveler, calling his life &#8220;picaresque.&#8221;</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=49" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/04/30/loss-of-a-great-neighborhood-reporter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hanging out with the planners</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/04/27/hanging-out-with-the-planners/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/04/27/hanging-out-with-the-planners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planning and Land Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloginweb/sallyclark/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello from the American Planning Association conference in Minneapolis! I&#8217;m here as a presenter with the Seattle Planning Commission, Puget Sound Regional Council and Port of Seattle to talk about Seattle-area efforts to save blue collar jobs. The panel discussion was this morning. I think it went well. No one walked out mid-way. Now I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello from the American Planning Association conference in Minneapolis!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m here as a presenter with the Seattle Planning Commission, Puget Sound Regional Council and Port of Seattle to talk about Seattle-area efforts to save blue collar jobs. The panel discussion was this morning. I think it went well. No one walked out mid-way.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m trolling the other panels. Neighborhood planning, neighborhood character, neighborhood health, neighborhoods for artists&#8230;. It&#8217;s basically a big planning candy store here. I&#8217;m hoping to bring back great ideas.</p>
<p>You can take a look at the powerpoint presentation we gave <a href="http://www.seattle.gov/council/clark/attachments/2009_blue_collar_jobs.pdf">here</a>.</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=44" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/04/27/hanging-out-with-the-planners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neighborhood interconnectedness</title>
		<link>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/02/22/neighborhood-interconnectedness/</link>
		<comments>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/02/22/neighborhood-interconnectedness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 18:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally J. Clark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neighborhoods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloginweb/sallyclark/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In talking on the the Sunday editorial page about the federal stimulus package and the Obama Administration&#8217;s willingness to focus on cities starved in the Bush era, Jim Vesely writes: &#8220;At the end of the day, cities are whole and not accumulations of individual neighborhoods.&#8221; This may be the toughest concept to drive home during [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="title">In talking on the the <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2008767682_opina22vesely.html">Sunday editorial page </a>about the federal stimulus package and the Obama Administration&#8217;s willingness to focus on cities starved in the Bush era, Jim Vesely writes:</div>
<p>&#8220;At the end of the day, cities are whole and not accumulations of individual neighborhoods.&#8221;</p>
<p>This may be the toughest concept to drive home during the neighborhood plan updates. Wallingford works as Wallingford only if all our neighborhoods make up a whole, healthy city in which people can hatch safe, affordable, sustainable lives.</p>
 <img src="http://clark.seattle.gov/?feed-stats-post-id=8" width="1" height="1" style="display: none;" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://clark.seattle.gov/2009/02/22/neighborhood-interconnectedness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
